Posted On October 26, 2012 By In Apple News, Featured And 537 Views

Apple’s Apology, That Is Not Really An Apology

Apple

Apple, having lost its case against Samsung over allegation of copying its iPad in the UK was ordered to print an apology. The Cupertino company  issued an apology, well a statement that was meant to be an apology in this case.

Apple has taken the opportunity to highlight that even-though the UK court decided that the Korean company did not copy the iPad with their Galaxy Tabs, other courts around the world found that they wilfully infringed Apple’s patents.

The company was also quick to quote from the initial resulting in which the judges stated that Apple’s iPad design is ‘cool’ whilst Samsung’s Galaxy Tabs are not so ‘cool’

 

[box]

Samsung / Apple UK judgment

On 9th July 2012 the High Court of Justice of England and Wales ruled that Samsung Electronic (UK) Limited’s Galaxy Tablet Computer, namely the Galaxy Tab 10.1, Tab 8.9 and Tab 7.7 do not infringe Apple’s registered design No. 0000181607-0001. A copy of the full judgment of the Highcourt is available on the following link www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Patents/2012/1882.html.

In the ruling, the judge made several important points comparing the designs of the Apple and Samsung products:

“The extreme simplicity of the Apple design is striking. Overall it has undecorated flat surfaces with a plate of glass on the front all the way out to a very thin rim and a blank back. There is a crisp edge around the rim and a combination of curves, both at the corners and the sides. The design looks like an object the informed user would want to pick up and hold. It is an understated, smooth and simple product. It is a cool design.”

“The informed user’s overall impression of each of the Samsung Galaxy Tablets is the following. From the front they belong to the family which includes the Apple design; but the Samsung products are very thin, almost insubstantial members of that family with unusual details on the back. They do not have the same understated and extreme simplicity which is possessed by the Apple design. They are not as cool.”

That Judgment has effect throughout the European Union and was upheld by the Court of Appeal on 18 October 2012. A copy of the Court of Appeal’s judgment is available on the following link www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2012/1339.html. There is no injunction in respect of the registered design in force anywhere in Europe.

However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design. A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple’s design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc. So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung willfully copied Apple’s far more popular iPad.

[/box]

 

Source: Apple

Tags : , , , , , , , , ,

Storm is a technology enthusiast, who resides in the UK. He enjoys reading and writing about technology.

Loading Google+ Comments ...